So, I was writing an essay on Aristotle's metaphysics and got stuck on his Theory of Universal's. I got lost between the "if it isn't predicted... it doesn't exist.."
I only got myself confused more then when I started reading it. Heh, out of the philospher's I think Aristotle is the more complicated one to understand.
Well at the moment, I turned it in - not my best paper, but it's something. I did add potentiality-actuality in though, that was probably one of the most important thing that the professor was looking for and God the unmoved mover.
I think I'll stick with the natural science theories then base my thoughts on some other guys ideaologies. I of course understand, phyiscs spawned metaphysics and philosophy was the true begining of all science...logic, analytics, mathematics,etc..